‘The Greatest Love of All’: Children’s Rights and the Corporate Sector

Theme

Accountability arrow_forward

Published: 7 June 2017

Join Global Child Forum and leading CSR business executives, policy makers, investors and thinkers at the CSR Asia Summit on September 26 – 27 in Bangkok where we will be discussing pressing challenges, emerging trends and opportunities to ‘future proof’ sustainable business.

In the 1980s ballad, The Greatest Love of All, US pop diva Whitney Houston sang, “I believe the children are our future; teach them well and let them lead the way…” While she sang convincingly, this is not a new sentiment – children have always been the future. But how and whom is responsible for ‘teaching them well and letting them lead the way’, well, that’s changing.

Increasingly the corporate sector is acknowledging that children, and their rights, are part of their business. They are understanding that profits and purpose are not mutually exclusive and that their growth depends not just on short-term returns but also on long-term societal gains. There is also a realisation that children’s issues are not just about charity, but about a real commitment to tackling some of the most pressing issues facing young people today; issues such as access to education, combatting sexual exploitation, online bullying, forced migration, access to clean and safe environments, and, of course, child labour.

Understanding the role that children’s rights play in your business starts by recognising that children are your stakeholders – they are your consumers, family members of your employees, your future workers and leaders. Supporting and advancing their development, and integrating their rights into your operations and communities, is paramount to the success of not only society – but your business. The perils of ignoring children’s rights in your operations and along your supply chain, have also been well-documented as tales of warning.

Business is a key economic driver of change

The launch of the Sustainable Development Goals last year has highlighted that business is – and must be – a driver of change if the goals are to be reached by 2030.  Business is a key economic driver in the communities in which they operate, they are employers, and they are consumers of the resources – whether they be human resources or environmental. Governments can’t do everything alone and civil society continues to be hampered – but business has the know-how, the resources and, increasingly, the will to make the difference.  However, this awareness must translate into real action.

Measuring Asia’s progress & promise

The Global Child Forum’s benchmark report, The Corporate Sector and Children’s Rights in Southeast Asia, provides a starting point for measuring the region’s progress – and promise — in this area. Launched last year with the Boston Consulting Group, the report evaluates nearly 300 of the region’s top companies to see how they address and report on children’s rights.

The results indicate that while many companies contribute to programmes and community investment initiatives involving children’s rights, these issues have not yet made it into the board room or into strategic business analysis.

“One thing that we noted is that those companies who successfully integrate children’s rights into their operations – and put them on the forefront of their sustainability agenda – have done so with the leadership and support at the board level. It must start at the highest levels of corporate governance,” says Fiona Rotberg, Global Child Forum’s Research Director.2016 SEA Benchmark infographic

A global perspective through a local lens

So, what can business do? The Children’s Rights and Business Principles, developed by UNICEF, the UN Global Compact and Save the Children in 2012, offer a road map for how business can approach children’s rights in the workplace, the marketplace and the community.  The ten principles set out concrete actions for business to respect and support children’s rights.

At the Global Child Forum on Southeast Asia, held in May 2016, Simon Lord, Group Chief Sustainability Officer for Sime Darby, one of Asia’s largest multinational conglomerates, highlighted the need to turn these principles into practice. “As a multinational,” said Lord, “Sime Darby must have a global perspective viewed through a local lens. Our anchor is the SDGs; our framework is the Children’s Rights and Business Principles executed down at the community level. It’s about creating a child-safe and friendly working environment for all our employees.”

Rick Ramli, Partner and Managing Director from the Boston Consulting Group Malaysia offers a perspective on how to move forward, based on the findings from benchmark report: “Companies in Southeast Asia are contributing to children’s issues through strategic programmes and donating to charities. Many of us have CSR programmes that fund causes in education, health or nutrition.” While these efforts are commendable, he notes that these CSR activities are too detached from companies’ day-to-day and core operations. Here there is an opportunity for development, for example by putting in place mechanisms to ensure product safety and safe marketing as well as prevent child labour and sexual exploitation.

What core actions can a company take?

But what are the core actions that a company can take? A few real-life examples illustrate what’s possible: A construction company is integrating a child perspective into their worksites, taking into consideration the presence of migrant workers’ children. A leading telecommunications company goes beyond sustainability and includes education and training for both children and teachers – providing access to online learning channels. A shoe manufacturer believes in paying living wages to ensure that the children of their employees can go to school, and not enter the workforce too early. A hotel chain works with a local NGO to keep children safe and reduce the risks of child abuse and trafficking.  The examples are numerous and during the month of May many of these company examples were highlighted on social media during Global Child Forum’s #30ways30days campaign.

The good news is that children’s rights are becoming more relevant for Asian companies and the corporate sector is on its way to realising that championing children’s rights will unlock more markets and create both shareholder and stakeholder value. And that’s certainly something worth singing about.

Global Child Forum will explore the business case for child’s rights and showcase ground-breaking research, good company examples and a range of free on-line risk assessment and planning tools at the CSR Asia Summit, 26 & 27 September in Bangkok. More details on this session will be available shortly. To register for the event go to the CSR Asia Summit website.

Author

Linda Lodding

Head of Communications
Global Child Forum

As the Head of Communications, Linda is responsible for bringing our work, and our message, to our stakeholders. She has long career in communications both in the private and public sector working for UN-affiliated organisations such as The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) and the Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation. Her public sector work is augmented by assignments in advertising, internet consulting and brand development. She holds an undergraduate degree from Barnard College, Columbia University and an MBA from the Stern School of Business, New York University. Linda joined Global Child Forum in 2015.

Resources

Download the Corporate Sector and Children’s Rights in Southeast Asia benchmark report.

For more information on how Sime Darby integrates children’s rights into their work, read Global Child Forum’s Sime Darby Deep Dive.

The Children’s Rights and Business Principles were developed by UNICEF, Save the Children and the UN Global Compact in order to offer business a set of comprehensive principles to guide them on the full range of actions they can take in the workplace, marketplace and community to respect and support children’s rights.

 

Explore similar content

Accountability
View all

Corporate Responses to Protecting Children's Rights in the Middle East and North Africa

In an effort to provide insights and guidance on how businesses protect – or fall short in protecting – children’s rights in the Middle East and North Africa, this report draws on one of Global Child Forum’s essential research products: The corporate sector and children’s rights benchmark. More specifically, insights are provided across three areas where the corporate sector impacts children’s rights: The Workplace, The Marketplace, The Community and the Environment. In 2014, Global Child Forum, in partnership with Boston Consulting Group, published a benchmark study of the 350 largest companies in the region. This report is a follow-up to that study. An updated benchmark analysis has been conducted on 20 of the region’s largest companies.

benchmark study

Corporate Responses to Protecting Children's Rights in South America

In an effort to provide insights and guidance on how businesses protect – or fall short in protecting – children’s rights in South America, this report draws on one of Global Child Forum’s essential research products ‘The corporate sector and children’s rights benchmark’. More specifically, insights are provided across three areas where the corporate sector impacts children’s rights: The Workplace, The Marketplace, The Community and the Environment. In 2017, Global Child Forum, in partnership with Boston Consulting Group, published a benchmark study of the 300 largest companies in the region. This report is a follow-up to that study. An updated benchmark analysis has been conducted on 20 of the region’s largest companies.

benchmark study

Corporate Responses to Protecting Children's Rights in South Africa

In an effort to provide insights and guidance on how businesses protect – or fall short in protecting – children’s rights in South Africa, this report draws on one of Global Child Forum’s essential research products ‘The corporate sector and children’s rights benchmark’. More specifically, insights are provided across three areas where the corporate sector impacts children’s rights: The Workplace, The Marketplace, The Community and the Environment. In 2015, Global Child Forum, in partnership with Boston Consulting Group, published a benchmark study of the 271 largest companies in the region. This report is a follow-up to that study. An updated benchmark analysis has been conducted on 20 of the region’s largest companies.

benchmark study

Corporate Responses to Protecting Children's Rights in Southeast Asia

In an effort to provide insights and guidance on how businesses protect – or fall short in protecting – children’s rights in the Southeast Asia region, this report makes use of two essential Global Child Forum research products: The Children Rights and Business Atlas and The corporate sector and children’s rights benchmark. More specifically, insights are provided across three areas where the corporate sector impacts children’s rights: The Workplace, The Marketplace, The Community and the Environment. Throughout this report, data from the Atlas highlights contextual factors that shape how companies can and should respond to children’s rights. This information is contrasted with the results of the Benchmark scoring for the 20 largest companies in Southeast Asia. A gap analysis provides recommendations for company actions that address risks and create positive impact on children’s rights in the region.

benchmark study

Global Child Forum Report
2018

On Wednesday, April 11, the 10th Global Child Forum 2018 was held at the Stockholm Royal Palace. Over 300 participants from around the world gathered to discuss child rights issues. Participants represented global companies, financial institutions, civil society, the UN, academia and government.

Investing in every child starts when business and investors recognize their influence on children. At the 10th Global Child Forum at the Stockholm Royal Palace, we discussed these matters. But we also listened. Read the Forum report to be inspired, take part of case stories and to learn more about how your business can take action to support children’s rights.

forum report

Norsk Hydro Brazil's journey towards social responsibility

Norsk Hydro entered Brazil in 2011 with a long history of fostering healthy communities that grew up around its operations in Norway. The company therefore had no small sense of the responsibilities of being an actor with an enormous impact on the lives of its workers and neighbours. The difficult history and operating environment of the Amazon region, however, challenge Hydro’s commitment to go “beyond compliance” to make a positive difference – particularly with regard to vulnerable populations, including children. This case study is no. 3 in a series of company reflections for Global Child Forum on how companies address children’s rights and child-related issues. All our reports and case studies can be found in our Knowledge Center.

case study

Global Report: The Corporate Sector and Children's Rights

Global Child Forum and the Boston Consulting Group initiated the Corporate Sector and Children’ Rights Benchmark study series in 2013 to fill a gap in research. The purpose of the series has been to develop a children’s rights benchmark for the corporate sector and to enable tracking of progress over time on how children’s rights are addressed by business. The data referred to in this reporting has been compiled from one global and five regional studies conducted between 2013-2016; the Nordic region, the Middle East and Northern Africa; Southern Africa, South America and Southeast Asia. In total, the reporting covers 2500 companies across nine different industries.

benchmark study

Additional insight: Private & State-owned companies

In the report The Corporate Sector and Children’s Rights in the Nordic Region, Global Child Forum and the Boston Consulting Group published the results from a benchmarking of how the 299 largest1 listed Nordic companies address children’s rights in their public reporting. To compare the findings from the screening of publicly listed companies, we assessed 30 non-listed Nordic companies; the 15 largest privately owned and the 15 largest state-owned. A summary of those results are presented below2. Of a total possible score of 9, the privately owned companies scored on average 2.1 points, while state-owned companies scored 3.7 on average. In contrast, the 15 largest listed companies scored 5.1 on average. GCF - BCG Nordic addendum - grafik1 One explanation for the difference could be due to the region’s stringent regulations on sustainability, reporting, and board accountability that affect primarily listed and state-owned companies. Due to the small sample size, not all industries are fully represented; approximately half of the private companies are in the Consumer Goods industry, with the remainder spread across Oil, Gas and Utilities, Food and Beverage and Industrials. The state-owned companies assessed are in all of the industries except ICT. RESULTS PER INDICATOR (%) GCF - BCG Nordic addendum - grafik2 When looking at the results for each of the indicators, it is notable that:

  • None of the privately owned companies have received points on Board Accountability and only two companies (13%) have identified their potential impact on children’s rights in risk assessments and materiality analyses.
  • The private and state-owned companies are lagging behind the listed companies when it comes to reporting on the results of their policies, for example against child labour, and establishing strategic collaborations with child rights organisations.
  • The privately owned companies have an opportunity to improve in addressing children’s rights issues other than child labour, such as product responsibility, responsible marketing or sexual exploitation. ___________________________ Based on revenue.  For more information about the methodology and the indicators used in the screening, please see The Corporate Sector and Children’s Rights in the Nordic Region. Companies that score between 6–9 points are considered high-scorers. Here, only state-owned and privately held companies are shown. For the high-scoring publicly listed companies, please see The Corporate Sector and Children’s Rights in the Nordic Region. The IKEA Group is regstered in the Netherlands. As a consequence, they are not part of the sample of companies included in the total average score of private Nordic companies. However, because of their Nordic origins, their child rights practices have been analysed for the sake of knowledge sharing.   Photo credit: Peter Tandlun

  • benchmark study

    Children's Rights and the Corporate Sector in the Nordic Region

    How are Nordic companies doing on children’s rights? Nordic companies have a reputation for innovation and socially responsible forward-thinking.  But how do the Nordics stack up when reporting  on children’s rights? Global Child Forum just launched the report focusing on the Nordic region  – Children’s Rights and the Corporate Sector in the Nordic Region. This study is the latest in a series of regional and global benchmarks which scans companies from all compass points and identifies if they report on children’s rights indicators. Do Nordic companies integrate children’s rights into core operations?  Address and report on children’s rights issues? Engage with programs that benefit children? The Nordic benchmark study scores 300 top companies headquartered in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland on these, and other, indicators.  The benchmark then assigns both an aggregate regional score as well as individual company scores. All companies included in the study also receive a scorecard with their result and are given an opportunity to respond or give feedback.   What are people saying? Read selected media coverage: Bloomberg: Nordics Lose Halo in Study Ranking Them With Emerging Markets Reuters: Nordic companies fall short on transparency over child rights Dagens Industri: Lågt engagemang för barnens rätt Sisua Radio/Sveriges Radio: Pohjoismaiset suuryritykset eivät loista lasten oikeuksien saralla Aktuell Hållbart: DEBATT Företag måste stärka kontrollen över sina leverantörsled, skriver Théo Jaekel och Jasmin Draszka-Ali, från advokatfirman Vinge.”Barnrättsfrågor – en blind fläck för nordiska storbolag”

    benchmark study

    Dig deeper

    Select a region, industry or theme below to learn more about our work there.

    Regions
    East Asia and Pacific arrow_forward
    Europe and Central Asia arrow_forward
    North America arrow_forward
    South Asia arrow_forward
    Sub-Saharan Africa arrow_forward
    Industries
    Basic Materials arrow_forward
    Consumer Goods arrow_forward
    Financials arrow_forward
    Food and Beverage arrow_forward
    Healthcare arrow_forward
    ICT arrow_forward
    Industrial goods arrow_forward
    Oil, Gas and Electricity arrow_forward
    Travel and Leisure arrow_forward
    Themes
    Accountability arrow_forward
    Child Labour arrow_forward
    Child participation arrow_forward
    Decent work arrow_forward
    Education arrow_forward
    Gender equality arrow_forward
    Impact investing arrow_forward
    Refugees and Migration arrow_forward
    Reporting arrow_forward