Connecting every child to a better future: How the mobile industry is contributing to children’s rights

Industry

ICT arrow_forward

Theme

Published: 4 December 2017

The ICT sector has an enormous role to play in protecting children online and connecting them to a better future. Mats Granryd, Director-General of the GSMA, the global body representing the interests of mobile operators worldwide, shares how his industry is contributing to children’s rights.

The GSMA represents nearly 800 of the world’s mobile operators, and more than 300 companies from across the mobile industry – device makers, infrastructure providers, software companies and others. As an industry, we are all focused on a common purpose: to connect everyone and everything to a better future. The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are at the very heart of this better future.

With over 5 billion subscribers connected, the GSMA has a unique opportunity, and obligation, to leverage the networks that we have built and the services we deliver to help achieve the SDGs.  The SDGs are an ambitious goal and require big thinking to achieve – and the mobile industry is taking on this challenge. In 2016, we became the first sector as a whole to commit to all 17 of the SDGs.

Achieving the SDGs – collectively and individually

Collaboration is essential – operators may compete fiercely within markets, but nearly 800 operators globally have aligned to address the world’s most pressing challenges.  I am very proud to say that mobile is already having a positive impact on all 17 Goals.

In September, we published the 2nd edition of our “Mobile Industry Impact Report”, which found that the mobile industry has increased its impact against all 17 SDGs in 2016. Overall, the industry’s contribution was the strongest around SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities).

Monitoring and measuring progress is key to our success – it allows us to identify the areas with more potential for impact, such as big data. And this reporting also provides an important blueprint for other industries as they commit to the SDGs.

4 billion

the number of people within reach of a 4G network

230 billion

the number of new subscribers in 2016

100 million

the number of new mobile money accounts registered

Ensuring a better future through company initiatives

Collectively and individually, mobile operators are undertaking a wide range of activities to help achieve the SDGs and ensure this better future for the world’s children. Let me share a few examples with you.

One very important one is in the area of child online protection. We work with our members through the GSMA Mobile Alliance Against Child Sexual Abuse Content. This global group of operators takes steps to keep their own services free from child sexual abuse content, but also provides an example for the wider industry – sharing experiences and best practices, monitoring emerging trends, and working with key stakeholders to understand what contribution the mobile industry can make.

For instance, through the Alliance, working with INHOPE, we have produced a guide to setting up and managing a hotline to support the end goal of having a reporting hotline in every country.

With UNICEF, we developed a guide to “Notice and Take Down” processes for industry players to help them work with national hotlines and law enforcement to keep their services free from child sexual abuse content, whilst understanding necessary steps to take to preserve evidence.

But mobile operators are not just working on combatting risks; we are also investing in opportunities to actively improve children’s lives through connectivity.

One might not automatically think of mobile money as a key enabler of children’s rights, but it can play a very important role. In Côte d’Ivoire, mobile money has transformed school registration for nearly 1.5 million secondary school students. Parents can now use their mobile to register for school and pay registration fees, a much more convenient process – no waiting in long queues to submit paper forms and cash payments – and they have assurance that payment has been made.

And we’re not only focused on developing markets; in the United States, Sprint is leading the “1 Million Project”, providing free devices and service to schools to benefit 1 million low-income high school students, helping to overcome the “homework gap”.

Partnering for progress

Of course, achieving the SDGs is not something that mobile operators can do alone – we must work not only across our industry, but with other industries, with governments and many other organizations to make this a reality.

The need for strong partnerships is borne out in so many of the examples that I cited. In Tanzania, we are working with UNICEF and the local authorities to address birth registration. In Côte d’Ivoire, mobile money providers are working with the Ministry of National and Technical Education to digitize school payments. And the operators in the Mobile Alliance Against Child Sexual Abuse Content work collaboratively with policymakers, law enforcement, hotline organizations and NGOs, as well as the wider mobile industry, to promote a robust and coordinated response to this crime and help safeguard children’s fundamental rights.

Beyond these specific examples, it’s instructive to consider the potential impacts of technology on children, good and bad, through the lens of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The GSMA and UNICEF are working in partnership to raise awareness of children’s rights amongst key stakeholders across the industry, as well as with policymakers.

We’ve run joint workshops in Latin America, Asia, and Africa around the safe and responsible use of mobile technology by children and how we can combat child sexual exploitation. We have also brought together industry, policymakers and activists to consider how we can empower young people to harness the power of connectivity to have their voices heard and positively engage with, and shape, the world around them.

"The mobile industry has perhaps one of the most important roles to play in shaping a more sustainable future. Every goal — from ending poverty and halting climate change to fighting injustice and inequality — can be positively impacted by ICT..."

Börje Ekholm, CEO, Ericsson, quote from 2017 Mobile Industry Impact Report: Sustainable Development Goals

About GSMA

The GSMA represents the interests of mobile operators worldwide, uniting nearly 800 operators with more than 300 companies in the broader mobile ecosystem, including handset and device makers, software companies, equipment providers and internet companies, as well as organisations in adjacent industry sectors. The GSMA also produces industry-leading events such as Mobile World Congress, Mobile World Congress Shanghai, Mobile World Congress Americas and the Mobile 360 Series conferences.

For more information, please visit the GSMA corporate website at www.gsma.com. Follow the GSMA on Twitter: @GSMA

Author

Mats Granryd

Director General
The GSMA

As Director General, Mats Granryd leads the GSMA in supporting its global membership through a range of industry programmes, advocacy initiatives and industry-convening events. In 2016, Mats led the mobile industry in becoming the first sector to commit to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Supporting this, Mats serves on the Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development, the Business & Sustainable Development Commission and The B Team. Before joining the GSMA, Mats was President and CEO of Tele2 and also spent 15 years in a variety of roles at Ericsson.

Explore similar content

ICT
& Programs and Partnerships
View all

Corporate Responses to Protecting Children's Rights in South Africa

In an effort to provide insights and guidance on how businesses protect – or fall short in protecting – children’s rights in South Africa, this report draws on one of Global Child Forum’s essential research products ‘The corporate sector and children’s rights benchmark’. More specifically, insights are provided across three areas where the corporate sector impacts children’s rights: The Workplace, The Marketplace, The Community and the Environment. In 2015, Global Child Forum, in partnership with Boston Consulting Group, published a benchmark study of the 271 largest companies in the region. This report is a follow-up to that study. An updated benchmark analysis has been conducted on 20 of the region’s largest companies.

benchmark study

Corporate Responses to Protecting Children's Rights in Southeast Asia

In an effort to provide insights and guidance on how businesses protect – or fall short in protecting – children’s rights in the Southeast Asia region, this report makes use of two essential Global Child Forum research products: The Children Rights and Business Atlas and The corporate sector and children’s rights benchmark. More specifically, insights are provided across three areas where the corporate sector impacts children’s rights: The Workplace, The Marketplace, The Community and the Environment. Throughout this report, data from the Atlas highlights contextual factors that shape how companies can and should respond to children’s rights. This information is contrasted with the results of the Benchmark scoring for the 20 largest companies in Southeast Asia. A gap analysis provides recommendations for company actions that address risks and create positive impact on children’s rights in the region.

benchmark study

Corporate Programs for Children’s Rights - Guidance and Best Practice

Global Child Forum and the Boston Consulting Group initiated the Corporate Sector and Children´s Rights Benchmark study series in 2013, to fill a gap in the existing research on how the corporate sector addresses children´s rights, both within their operations and in communities. We have produced one global and five regional studies: the Nordic region, the Middle East and Northern Africa; Southern Africa, South America and Southeast Asia. Based on this extensive knowledge, we are now delving deeper into our data in order to provide guidance for companies on how to further their efforts to implement the Children´s Rights and Business Principles. It is evident when analysing our data that almost half (46%) of all businesses establish their own programs and/or donate to charity. We have studied the programs of 13 companies, to identify pertinent common features that can be used as building blocks for other companies. The building blocks needed for a corporate children´s rights program to achieve maximum positive impact are: Relevance, Governance, Collaboration, and Measurement. In this guide, we describe each building block in detail, followed by concrete company examples.

guidance toolkit
ICT
View all

Corporate Responses to Protecting Children's Rights in the Middle East and North Africa

In an effort to provide insights and guidance on how businesses protect – or fall short in protecting – children’s rights in the Middle East and North Africa, this report draws on one of Global Child Forum’s essential research products: The corporate sector and children’s rights benchmark. More specifically, insights are provided across three areas where the corporate sector impacts children’s rights: The Workplace, The Marketplace, The Community and the Environment. In 2014, Global Child Forum, in partnership with Boston Consulting Group, published a benchmark study of the 350 largest companies in the region. This report is a follow-up to that study. An updated benchmark analysis has been conducted on 20 of the region’s largest companies.

benchmark study

Corporate Responses to Protecting Children's Rights in South America

In an effort to provide insights and guidance on how businesses protect – or fall short in protecting – children’s rights in South America, this report draws on one of Global Child Forum’s essential research products ‘The corporate sector and children’s rights benchmark’. More specifically, insights are provided across three areas where the corporate sector impacts children’s rights: The Workplace, The Marketplace, The Community and the Environment. In 2017, Global Child Forum, in partnership with Boston Consulting Group, published a benchmark study of the 300 largest companies in the region. This report is a follow-up to that study. An updated benchmark analysis has been conducted on 20 of the region’s largest companies.

benchmark study

Global Report: The Corporate Sector and Children's Rights

Global Child Forum and the Boston Consulting Group initiated the Corporate Sector and Children’ Rights Benchmark study series in 2013 to fill a gap in research. The purpose of the series has been to develop a children’s rights benchmark for the corporate sector and to enable tracking of progress over time on how children’s rights are addressed by business. The data referred to in this reporting has been compiled from one global and five regional studies conducted between 2013-2016; the Nordic region, the Middle East and Northern Africa; Southern Africa, South America and Southeast Asia. In total, the reporting covers 2500 companies across nine different industries.

benchmark study

Investor Insights on Children’s Rights

Global Child Forum and GES International have surveyed asset owner signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) in 2014, 2015, and 2017, in order to understand perspectives of the investor community on integrating children’s rights issues into decision-making processes. We are now taking stock of the knowledge generated from these surveys and from recent in-depth interviews with nine investors. The main findings of our work are presented in this report. The purpose of this report is twofold: to provide information and inspiration to investors by highlighting the relevance of children’s rights, and to supply concrete tools and frameworks for applying related perspectives. We also present two company examples which serve to demonstrate how investors can work with children’s rights on a practical level.

benchmark study

Business investments in children's education

During 2017, Global Child Forum initiated a project aiming at demonstrating how investments in education leads to positive pay-offs not only for the community but also for business. Rightshouse was engaged to carry out the mapping exercise and deliver a database/spreadsheet categorizing collected data – and a report presenting the main findings of the assignment. The report points out that businesses recognize the central importance of education both for development in society as a whole and for the business sector specifically. But while it is well documented that the education sector globally suffers from a significant lack of resources, contributions from the private sector are limited. All findings of the mapping exercise, together with business cases, are presented in the report.

guidance toolkit

Additional insight: Private & State-owned companies

In the report The Corporate Sector and Children’s Rights in the Nordic Region, Global Child Forum and the Boston Consulting Group published the results from a benchmarking of how the 299 largest1 listed Nordic companies address children’s rights in their public reporting. To compare the findings from the screening of publicly listed companies, we assessed 30 non-listed Nordic companies; the 15 largest privately owned and the 15 largest state-owned. A summary of those results are presented below2. Of a total possible score of 9, the privately owned companies scored on average 2.1 points, while state-owned companies scored 3.7 on average. In contrast, the 15 largest listed companies scored 5.1 on average. GCF - BCG Nordic addendum - grafik1 One explanation for the difference could be due to the region’s stringent regulations on sustainability, reporting, and board accountability that affect primarily listed and state-owned companies. Due to the small sample size, not all industries are fully represented; approximately half of the private companies are in the Consumer Goods industry, with the remainder spread across Oil, Gas and Utilities, Food and Beverage and Industrials. The state-owned companies assessed are in all of the industries except ICT. RESULTS PER INDICATOR (%) GCF - BCG Nordic addendum - grafik2 When looking at the results for each of the indicators, it is notable that:

  • None of the privately owned companies have received points on Board Accountability and only two companies (13%) have identified their potential impact on children’s rights in risk assessments and materiality analyses.
  • The private and state-owned companies are lagging behind the listed companies when it comes to reporting on the results of their policies, for example against child labour, and establishing strategic collaborations with child rights organisations.
  • The privately owned companies have an opportunity to improve in addressing children’s rights issues other than child labour, such as product responsibility, responsible marketing or sexual exploitation. ___________________________ Based on revenue.  For more information about the methodology and the indicators used in the screening, please see The Corporate Sector and Children’s Rights in the Nordic Region. Companies that score between 6–9 points are considered high-scorers. Here, only state-owned and privately held companies are shown. For the high-scoring publicly listed companies, please see The Corporate Sector and Children’s Rights in the Nordic Region. The IKEA Group is regstered in the Netherlands. As a consequence, they are not part of the sample of companies included in the total average score of private Nordic companies. However, because of their Nordic origins, their child rights practices have been analysed for the sake of knowledge sharing.   Photo credit: Peter Tandlun

  • benchmark study

    Children's Rights and the Corporate Sector in the Nordic Region

    How are Nordic companies doing on children’s rights? Nordic companies have a reputation for innovation and socially responsible forward-thinking.  But how do the Nordics stack up when reporting  on children’s rights? Global Child Forum just launched the report focusing on the Nordic region  – Children’s Rights and the Corporate Sector in the Nordic Region. This study is the latest in a series of regional and global benchmarks which scans companies from all compass points and identifies if they report on children’s rights indicators. Do Nordic companies integrate children’s rights into core operations?  Address and report on children’s rights issues? Engage with programs that benefit children? The Nordic benchmark study scores 300 top companies headquartered in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland on these, and other, indicators.  The benchmark then assigns both an aggregate regional score as well as individual company scores. All companies included in the study also receive a scorecard with their result and are given an opportunity to respond or give feedback.   What are people saying? Read selected media coverage: Bloomberg: Nordics Lose Halo in Study Ranking Them With Emerging Markets Reuters: Nordic companies fall short on transparency over child rights Dagens Industri: Lågt engagemang för barnens rätt Sisua Radio/Sveriges Radio: Pohjoismaiset suuryritykset eivät loista lasten oikeuksien saralla Aktuell Hållbart: DEBATT Företag måste stärka kontrollen över sina leverantörsled, skriver Théo Jaekel och Jasmin Draszka-Ali, från advokatfirman Vinge.”Barnrättsfrågor – en blind fläck för nordiska storbolag”

    benchmark study

    Dig deeper

    Select a region, industry or theme below to learn more about our work there.

    Regions
    East Asia and Pacific arrow_forward
    Europe and Central Asia arrow_forward
    North America arrow_forward
    South Asia arrow_forward
    Sub-Saharan Africa arrow_forward
    Industries
    Basic Materials arrow_forward
    Consumer Goods arrow_forward
    Financials and Property arrow_forward
    Food and Beverage arrow_forward
    Healthcare arrow_forward
    ICT arrow_forward
    Industrials arrow_forward
    Oil, Gas and Utilities arrow_forward
    Travel and Leisure arrow_forward
    Themes
    Accountability arrow_forward
    Child Labour arrow_forward
    Child participation arrow_forward
    Decent work arrow_forward
    Education arrow_forward
    Gender equality arrow_forward
    Impact investing arrow_forward
    Refugees and Migration arrow_forward
    Reporting arrow_forward